Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
September 09, 2010, 08:24:13 AM
Home Home Help Search Login Register
News: Additions to Rules. You are responsible for knowing and following these. Review here: Consolidated Rules and Mission

Share |

+  Old Elm Tree
|-+  Featured Columnists
| |-+  Common Sense by Allentown Jake (Moderator: AllentownJake)
| | |-+  It is 1930, what are Herbert Hoover and his administration saying
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6 Go Down Print
Author Topic: It is 1930, what are Herbert Hoover and his administration saying  (Read 941 times)
AllentownJake
Mod
Sneetch
*
Posts: 4725



« on: February 02, 2010, 03:32:12 AM »

December 1929

"I am convinced that through these measures we have reestablished confidence."
- President Herbert Hoover


February 1930

There is nothing in the situation to be disturbed about."
- Secretary of the Treasury Andrew Mellon (The Tim Geithner of the early 30s)


March 8, 1930

“President Hoover predicted today that the worst effect of the crash upon unemployment will have been passed during the next sixty days.”

—Washington dispatch

March 16, 1930

 "The spring of 1930 marks the end of a period of grave concern...American business is steadily coming back to a normal level of prosperity."
-Herbert Hoover, President of the United States

May 1, 1930

"While the crash only took place six months ago, I am convinced we have now passed through the worst -- and with continued unity of effort we shall rapidly recover."
- Herbert Hoover, President of the United States

June 29, 1930
"The worst is over without a doubt."
James J. Davis, Secretary of Labor

August 29, 1930

"American labor may now look to the future with confidence."
James J. Davis, Secretary of Labor

September 12, 1930

"We have hit bottom and are on the upswing."
James J. Davis, Secretary of Labor


October 20, 1930


“During the past year you have carried the credit system of the nation safely through a most difficult crisis. In this success you have demonstrated not alone the soundness of the credit system, but also the capacity of the bankers in emergency.”

—Herbert Hoover, Address before the annual convention of The American Bankers Association, Cleveland

Than you had the economic cheerleaders of their day up in Harvard.

"...there are indications that the severest phase of the recession is over..."
- Harvard Economic Society (HES) Jan 18, 1930

"... the outlook continues favorable..."
- HES Mar 29, 1930

"... the outlook is favorable..."
- HES Apr 19, 1930

"...by May or June the spring recovery forecast in our letters of last December and November should clearly be apparent..."
- HES May 17, 1930

"... irregular and conflicting movements of business should soon give way to a sustained recovery..."
- HES June 28, 1930

"... the present depression has about spent its force..."
- HES, Aug 30, 1930

"We are now near the end of the declining phase of the depression."
- HES Nov 15, 1930

"Stabilization at [present] levels is clearly possible."
- HES Oct 31, 1931


 pitchfork

There will be no recovery, till the causes of the crisis are addressed.  There will be no addressing the causes of the crisis till it is the only option of the politicians.

« Last Edit: February 02, 2010, 03:57:57 AM by AllentownJake » Logged

Forget regret, or life is yours to miss. No other road. No other way. No day but today . - Jonathan Larson
Radio_Lady
Writers
Sneetch
*
Posts: 666


Ellen Kimball and husband Al, the Digital Dude


WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2010, 04:19:16 AM »

Allentown Jake,

Thanks for the fascinating quotations. What source did you use for these?

My husband was born in 1934; my birthday was in 1939.  The first president we remember is Franklin D. Roosevelt.

I often wish I could talk with my father, deceased in 1988, who was a local Democratic politician, councilman, vice mayor and judge in North Miami, Florida in the 1950s and 1960s.  He was a lawyer by profession, born on November 11, 1911, and recalled the depression quite well because he was 18 years old in 1929. His father was a provisioner of butter, eggs and cheese. They had enough to eat, but Dad had heart problems because of the rich diet.  I realized only today that if he had been in good enough health, he might have made it to November 11, 2011, when he would have been 100 years old.

I watched a PBS special on Herbert Hoover which was very interesting. He spent part of his boyhood in Newberg, Oregon, not far from where we live. Hoover's parents both died and he came west to live with his maternal uncle, a country doctor. The home he lived in is open for visits.  The day we went out there, it was closed.  We should visit there again this spring or summer!

Here's a picture of the restored home and other information about Hoover's life before he moved to Salem, OR, then on to California.

http://web.oregon.com/trips/herbert_hoover_home.cfm

Ellen Kimball, Portland, Oregon
« Last Edit: February 02, 2010, 04:24:30 AM by Radio_Lady » Logged


Radio_Lady Ellen Kimball and husband Al.
Suburban Portland, Oregon
www.ellenkimball.blogspot.com
AllentownJake
Mod
Sneetch
*
Posts: 4725



« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2010, 04:26:11 AM »

Allentown Jake,

Thanks for the fascinating quotations. What source did you use for these?

My husband was born in 1934; my birthday was in 1939.  The first president we remember is Franklin D. Roosevelt.

I often wish I could talk with my father, deceased in 1988, who was a local Democratic politician, councilman, vice mayor and judge in North Miami, Florida in the 1950s and 1960s.  He was a lawyer by profession, born on November 11, 1911, and recalled the depression quite well because he was 18 years old in 1929. His father was a provisioner of butter, eggs and cheese. They had enough to eat, but Dad had heart problems because of the rich diet.  I realized only today that if he had been in good enough health, he might have made it to November 11, 2011, when he would have been 100 years old.

I watched a PBS special on Herbert Hoover which was very interesting. He spent part of his boyhood in a neighboring Oregon town and the home he lived in is open for visits.

Ellen Kimball, Portland, Oregon

Results of a basic internet search.  Herbert Hoover, was actually a really decent man, touted as a pragmatist and a genius, and was really to the left of the 21st century democratic party on some economic issues and the role of government.

The man just did not have the intellectual capacity to understand the actual system was broken, which is my fear with Mr. Obama. 

He's a nice guy, pretty smart, and not ideologically bound.  That being said, he seems to have this misplaced idea fed to him by Geithner and Summers that you can prop up the system and do some minor tweaks.  He's Herbert Hoover redux.

There will be 3,000,000 foreclosures this year and 17% of the population is unemployed, underemployed, or has quit looking.  Nothing has "stabilized"
Logged

Forget regret, or life is yours to miss. No other road. No other way. No day but today . - Jonathan Larson
Radio_Lady
Writers
Sneetch
*
Posts: 666


Ellen Kimball and husband Al, the Digital Dude


WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2010, 05:14:18 AM »

Thanks for the information, Jake. I had a full life from my teens to my 60s promoting Democratic goals.
Last year, a full-blown medical crisis caused me to re-think my next decade, ages 70 to 80 (hopefully) and how I want to spend it. I've taken the high road and de-emphasized political thinking in order to improve my health (swimming & walking 4x a week), having fun with my 75 yr. old husband, two children and five grandchildren.

So I am no longer trying to cram my ideas down Republican throats -- or any other throats! Have reinvented myself as a useful volunteer, helper to several women who are trying to start smalll businesses, great mom to my 41 year old daughter & family, as well as my divorced son and his family, Twitter member (quick fix and I'm done), and just general good old girl.

Hopefully, Obama will make some promising decisions in this interim period.  I'll check the ballot in November 2010 and vote my conscience, which is liberal.  The world will continue to turn, and people like you will be on top of things. I'm totally comfortable with that.

"I'm just a kid again, doin' what I did again, singing a song..."   



Logged


Radio_Lady Ellen Kimball and husband Al.
Suburban Portland, Oregon
www.ellenkimball.blogspot.com
Nikki Stone 1
level
Sneetch
*
Posts: 3651



« Reply #4 on: February 02, 2010, 02:28:41 PM »

Another quote:

Quote
Jon Stewart to Austan Goolsbee:

"You're saying that we had to spend like 700, 800 billion dollars to not go into a depression; so that's what saved us from the cataclysm.  So why then...if that's the thing that pulled us out, why stop the spending if we're not really out. 'Cause the ONLY people that are out so far are the people that got us in, which are the banks. "

http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/mon-february-1-2010-austan-goolsbee




And...

"Hey everybody!  We're going to Depression Land!  --Jon Stewart to audience

"You're a professor of economics??"  --Jon Steward to Austan Goolsbee
« Last Edit: February 02, 2010, 02:32:44 PM by Nikki Stone 1 » Logged

Zenlitened
level
Sneetch
*
Posts: 278


« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2010, 03:02:34 PM »

If you are not already a fan, be sure to start reading "News From 1930," a day-by-day reenactment of the Wall Street Journal from the '29 Crash/Downtrend/Depression years:

http://newsfrom1930.blogspot.com/

The blog title's a bit of a misnomer, since by now it's covering the year 1931.

But all along, the similarities between now and then have been downright eerie at times.

The vocabulary of market-related blather hasn't changed much, nor has the habit of making bold, confident-sounding pronouncements on what the market and the economy have in store for us next.

We know how some of those pronouncements back then turned out. When I hear the same "all is well, the worst is behind us!" kind of talk today... well, I guess my cynical nature makes it difficult to share that optimism.

Logged
inna
Sneetch
*
Posts: 391



« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2010, 03:24:14 PM »

Fascinating.  But do you guys REALLY expect/predict the Second Great Depression?  And if yes, how bad is it going to be?
Logged
SphericalXS
Area Mod
Sneetch
*
Posts: 1624


Florida's East Coast


« Reply #7 on: February 02, 2010, 03:50:31 PM »

That blog is very interesting, Zenlitened.

It's like deja vu all over again.

 Sad
Logged

“Hope has two beautiful daughters: their names are Anger and Courage. Anger that things are the way they are. Courage to make them the way they ought to be.” – Saint Augustine
  
Bellator
Global Mod
Sneetch
*
Posts: 2327


« Reply #8 on: February 02, 2010, 07:15:55 PM »

Excellent.

I like the OP you put together and can see how it impacts the reality of what we are hearing today.

again...Excellent!!!..... you rock
Logged
bertman
Area Mod
Sneetch
*
Posts: 1462


« Reply #9 on: February 02, 2010, 11:55:41 PM »

I'm not an economist or even knowledgeable about finance with a capital F, but my $0.25 worth is that our nation and economy now have a much higher percentage of investors (meaning people who rely semi-soley or soley on their investments for income) than there were in the pre-Depression era.

I think that's a big part of the problem because those folks depend upon the fortunes of the stock market and NOT on their business acumen or their skills as a producer, so the government is trying to prop up the markets despite all the evidence that they are built on a foundation of sand.

Also, those investors are the ones who may be demanding the bailouts.

Am I way off base here?


Logged
AllentownJake
Mod
Sneetch
*
Posts: 4725



« Reply #10 on: February 03, 2010, 12:31:08 AM »

I'm not an economist or even knowledgeable about finance with a capital F, but my $0.25 worth is that our nation and economy now have a much higher percentage of investors (meaning people who rely semi-soley or soley on their investments for income) than there were in the pre-Depression era.

I think that's a big part of the problem because those folks depend upon the fortunes of the stock market and NOT on their business acumen or their skills as a producer, so the government is trying to prop up the markets despite all the evidence that they are built on a foundation of sand.

Also, those investors are the ones who may be demanding the bailouts.

Am I way off base here?




Nope the growth of financial services as an employer and producer of GDP has been exponential since 1981.  Financial services are our brawndo from idiocracy.  It is employing a shit load of people, but is destroying real economic growth in all other sectors.
Logged

Forget regret, or life is yours to miss. No other road. No other way. No day but today . - Jonathan Larson
Prospero
Area Mod
Sneetch
*
Posts: 961


Embrace the horror.


« Reply #11 on: February 03, 2010, 04:28:37 AM »

Am I way off base here?
Nope the growth of financial services as an employer and producer of GDP has been exponential since 1981.  Financial services are our brawndo from idiocracy.  It is employing a shit load of people, but is destroying real economic growth in all other sectors.

I don't know, but I believe the "recovery" is really just a marketing effort to maintain confidence in a system on the edge of complete collapse. They are selling snake oil.

Much of the financial sector produces nothing, but they get a percentage for managing the simple transfer of wealth (or creating poverty)-proverbial moneychangers. Like health insurance companies; they do nothing to contribute to health; they seem to be sort of a protection racket.

If Jesus were here, he and Michael Moore would be tearing Wall Street to pieces.

Logged

"I am not bound to please thee with my answers."~Shakespeare
"Democracy is the road to socialism."~Karl Marx
"Injustice anywere is a threat to justice everywhere."~Martin Luther King Jr.
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."~George Carlin
Maxdadog
level
Sneetch
*
Posts: 809



« Reply #12 on: February 03, 2010, 12:34:37 PM »

Quote
Much of the financial sector produces nothing, but they get a percentage for managing the simple transfer of wealth (or creating poverty)-proverbial moneychangers. Like health insurance companies; they do nothing to contribute to health; they seem to be sort of a protection racket.

Couldn't agree more. I don't understand, either, why there is an acceptance that manufacturing is never coming back to this country? The entire national work force supported by small businesses, green jobs and service jobs? I have doubts.

The health insurance industry business is a kind of pooled risk Ponzi scheme. It was not enough for them with their actuarial tables just to grow their business on the front end by recruiting a larger pool, they then cut risk by not underwriting sicker people, they took another step towards making profit - namely denying payments when their insureds had already consumed services- sticking them with the bill. This is the basis of pre-existing clauses and denial of coverage/payments.
Logged
Prospero
Area Mod
Sneetch
*
Posts: 961


Embrace the horror.


« Reply #13 on: February 03, 2010, 01:46:52 PM »

I don't understand, either, why there is an acceptance that manufacturing is never coming back to this country? The entire national work force supported by small businesses, green jobs and service jobs? I have doubts.

I have those same doubts, and my gut tells me that people who say that kind of stuff are the very people we're talking about--those making money without producing anything.

I'm opposed to cap-and-trade for two reasons: 1) The cost will be entirely passed to consumers, and the projected benefit of less than 0.5 degrees C is more easily achieved with long-term solutions; and 2) because Wall Street is already planning to take their cuts from transactions the produce--you guessed it--no tangible product.

I believe that the entire planet is at a population-driven turning point, and the economic, social and environmental problems are converging to create a need for a systemic solution that I'm not sure the human population has the unity or collective will to provide. When I hear estimate that our population is going to grow from 6.6 billion to 10 or 12 billion, and wonder if the real number is more like 2 or 3 billion. Our political and economic infrastructure is far more fragile that those we trust to manage them would have us believe.

I don't know this, but I believe this.
Logged

"I am not bound to please thee with my answers."~Shakespeare
"Democracy is the road to socialism."~Karl Marx
"Injustice anywere is a threat to justice everywhere."~Martin Luther King Jr.
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."~George Carlin
Maxdadog
level
Sneetch
*
Posts: 809



« Reply #14 on: February 03, 2010, 04:56:27 PM »

I don't understand, either, why there is an acceptance that manufacturing is never coming back to this country? The entire national work force supported by small businesses, green jobs and service jobs? I have doubts.

I have those same doubts, and my gut tells me that people who say that kind of stuff are the very people we're talking about--those making money without producing anything.

I'm opposed to cap-and-trade for two reasons: 1) The cost will be entirely passed to consumers, and the projected benefit of less than 0.5 degrees C is more easily achieved with long-term solutions; and 2) because Wall Street is already planning to take their cuts from transactions the produce--you guessed it--no tangible product.

I believe that the entire planet is at a population-driven turning point, and the economic, social and environmental problems are converging to create a need for a systemic solution that I'm not sure the human population has the unity or collective will to provide. When I hear estimate that our population is going to grow from 6.6 billion to 10 or 12 billion, and wonder if the real number is more like 2 or 3 billion. Our political and economic infrastructure is far more fragile that those we trust to manage them would have us believe.

I don't know this, but I believe this.

I don't know enough about cap n trade but what you say is troubling.

Population is the 2000 lb elephant in the room no one wants to talk about. All talk of the earth's carrying capacity have ceased. Water ( clean, potable) will be the next big shortage and not petro- oil, according to some sources. It already is in a number of places.

The degradation of arable soil, salinization of soil, deforestation are going to go on no matter what or who is in power because human demand is the driver.

This generation of 20 year olds and their kids will be facing a global problem the likes of which we have never seen and probably can't imagine. Unless of course the usual three horsemen appear: disease, war and famine.

We are an intelligent-stupid species with a very self focused short term view of world history and time. In the short blip that man has appeared we have made some dramatic changes. Others may point out that dramatic climactic and natural catastrophes have occurred in the past that make our contribution miniscule.   That is true. But we weren't here then and we may not be here later.

A few years ago I was sitting around one summer evening with some good friends, folks not given to extreme dramatic views nor exaggerations. People who have lived a long life, raised kids and enjoy their grand kids. I wondered where they saw mankind in 150 years? Some were engineers, or teachers, I expected speculation about off world colonies, or some innovative technological solutions. Nope. The majority said: We, mankind, won't be here. It was sobering.

We may not even be able to actually create the multiple solutions, but, I am pretty sure we do not have the will to do so. It's as if we can sit and send info on the inter net and yet, we are still as a world, behaving like we live in Victorian times.

Let's just charge the light brigade through the Khyber Pass and ally with the Pashtuns against the Taliban! Tally ho lads!  sarcasm
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
SimplePortal 2.3.2 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!